(9c) Discovery of the Solar System

Early History, False Leads

    As noted earlier, Aristarchus of Samos proposed that the Earth revolved around the Sun, but the idea was rejected by later Greek astronomers, in particular by Hipparchus. Ptolemy, living in Egypt in the 2nd century AD, expressed the consensus when he argued that all fixed stars were on some distant sphere which rotated around the Earth. Ptolemy tried to assemble and write down all that was known in his day about the heavens, and his influence was great, extending (as noted below) even to the 1600s.

    Yet anything that moved across the celestial sphere--Sun, Moon and planets--had to be able somehow to slip around it. The planets, in particular, were hard to understand, because their motion was not simple.

    Venus and Mercury moved back and forth across the position of the Sun, sometimes rising before the Sun as morning stars, sometimes setting after it as evening stars, but never appearing in the midnight sky. Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, on the other hand, did not follow the Sun in the sky. They all tended to move in the same direction around the ecliptic, but now and then they would stop, move backwards for a while ("retrograde motion"), and then resume their usual motion.

For a discussion of the discovery of the solar system which includes a "moving picture" illustrating retrograde motion, click here.

    Ptolemy tried to explain all that, using a theory which started with Hipparchus. Following the work of Aristarchus and Hipparchus, it was accepted that the Moon moved around Earth. Ptolemy assumed that the Sun, planets and the distant stars (whatever those were) also moved around the Earth (For a dissenting opinion, see here). To the Greeks, the circle represented perfection, and Ptolemy assumed Moon, Sun and stars moved in circles too. Since the motion was not exactly uniform (a point examined in section #12a, from a more modern viewpoint), he assumed that the center of these circles was some distance away from the Earth.

    While the Sun moved around Earth, Venus and Mercury obviously moved around it, on circles of their own. But what about Mars, Jupiter and Saturn? Cleverly, Ptolemy proposed that like Venus and Mercury, each of them also rotated around a point in the sky that orbited around Earth like the Sun, except that those points were empty. The backtracking of the planets now looked similar to the backtracking of Venus and Mercury. The center carrying each of those planets accounted for the planet's regular motion, but to this the planet's own motion around that center had to be added, and sometimes the sum of the two made the planet appear (for a while) to advance backwards.

    This "explanation" left open the question what the planets, Sun and Moon were, and why they displayed such strange motions. But worse, it was also inaccurate. As the positions of the planets were measured more and more accurately, additional corrections had to be introduced.

    Yet Ptolemy's view of the solar system dominated European astronomy for over 1000 years. One reason was that astronomy almost stopped in its tracks during the decline and fall of the Roman Empire and during the "dark ages" that followed. The study of the heavens continued in the Arab world, under Arab rulers, but of all the achievements of Arab astronomers, the one in which they exerted the greatest influence was the preservation and translation of Ptolemy's books.

[By the way, Ptolemy's "Almagest" is still in print. An annotated translation by G.J. Toomer was published in 1984 by Princeton University Press and is now available in paperback for $39.50. See p. 120, Nature vol. 397, 14 January 1999.]

Copernicus (1473-1543)

    That made it easy to estimate their distances from the Sun in terms of the Earth-Sun distance. Mars, Jupiter and Saturn moved in bigger circles, and they moved more slowly, so that whenever the Earth overtook them, they seemed to move backwards.

    Many books and plays exist on the life of Galilei, the Italian scholar who laid the foundation to the discipline known for many years as "natural philosophy," now called physics.

    He was the first to observe the planets through a telescope, and what he saw convinced him that Copernicus was right. How his agressive defense of the Copernican theory turned the Catholic church against him and cost him his freedom is a fascinating story, but it goes beyond our scope here. (For a 1636 painting of Galileo, with links to more information, see here.)

    Galileo did not invent the telescope; that was done by lensmakers in Holland and elsewhere (eyeglasses had been in use for centuries). Unlike later astronomical telescopes, which turn the picture upside down, the first version worked the way opera glasses do, combining two lenses of different types. Opera glasses magnify about 2-3 times: Galileo pushed the technology to its limits, magnifying his view 8-fold and in a later instrument 33 times.

    That was the instrument with which, in 1609-10, Galileo made his revolutionary discoveries. He observed the Moon and saw a world with mountains and "seas," and risking blindness (since the Sun should never be looked at through a telescope) he also observed sunspots. When he turned his telescope to the planet Jupiter, he saw four moons orbiting around it, all practically in the same plane, close to the ecliptic (and therefore, they and the planet all seem to lie on the same straight line; you can get the same view through good binoculars or any telescope), very much like a miniature version of the kind of solar system proposed by Copernicus.

    And when he looked at Venus, he saw its visible shape changing like that of the moon, becoming a crescent when Venus was between us and the Sun, a time when most of its sunlit half faced away from Earth. Galileo was persecuted for advocating the world view of Copernicus, but his observations, which were soon confirmed by other astronomers, convinced all scholars that this was indeed the way the Sun, Earth, Moon and the planets were related.

Exploring Further:

Site about Ptolemy.

Site on Galileo.

Very detailed and long site on the history of astronomy.

Arthur Koestler, The Sleepwalkers, Arkana reprint edition 1990

A concise review, by Owen Gingerich, of "De Revolutionibus Orbium Celesium " (On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres) by Nicolaus Copernicus, appeared in the journal Nature--vol. 391, p. 140, 8 January 1998. A 1992 translation of the book by Rossen (452 pages) is available from Willmann-Bell ($39.95)--see http://www.willbell.com. That publisher is also offering other writings by Copernicus, "Galileo at Work" by Drake and various books on the history of astronomy.

Laura Fermi and Gilberto Bernadini: Galileo and the Scientific Revolution, Basic Books 1962

The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy by James Evans, Oxford Univ. Press, 1998; reviewed by J.D. North, "Nature ", vol. 398, p. 385, 1 April 1999